Over the past week, British politics has taken a tumultuous turn, throwing into question the state of the country's democracy. What seemed like a relative oasis of sanity compared to the current state of American politics has turned out to be a misleading perception. The unraveling began with the dismissal of a Home Secretary who advocated for law enforcement to crack down on anarchy and anti-Semitism on the streets of the capital.
However, this was overshadowed by the appointment of a former Prime Minister as the Foreign Secretary, despite his resignation seven years ago after being rejected in a referendum. Furthermore, this appointment came with a peerage, granting him a place in the House of Lords indefinitely, without being held accountable by the elected representatives or voters.
Adding to the chaos, the Supreme Court ruled that the government's plans to tackle illegal immigration were unlawful. The decision to halt the deportation scheme, which may indeed have flaws, was made by British judges based on the principles of international law. But some have questioned the justification, pointing out the United Nations' involvement in processing asylum claims in Rwanda, allegedly considered unsafe by the judges.
These recent events reflect a concerning pattern where the will of the people and elected representatives is increasingly frustrated by legal activism and unelected figures. This phenomenon is not new and can be traced back to the Blair Revolution, which gave rise to a government dominated by lawyers and the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into British law. Critics argue that this legal framework has hindered the functioning of conservative policies and even influenced the outcome of the Brexit process.
As major institutions in the country are being influenced by progressive ideologies, the state of British democracy appears to be at risk. The Metropolitan Police Commissioner's selective enforcement of laws based on political expediency is a worrying sign. While the Prime Minister seems powerless to address the situation, the Opposition celebrates court rulings without presenting viable alternatives. Amidst these developments, it becomes clear that the initial impression of a saner and more stable political system in Britain was misleading.
In conclusion, recent events have shed light on the challenges and frustrations faced by British democracy. From the increasing influence of unelected figures to judicial activism, the workings of democracy seem compromised. It is imperative for the citizens of Britain to closely monitor and engage with the evolving political landscape to ensure that their voices are heard and that democracy remains intact.