Deportation saga of notorious gang rapist reveals flaws in legal system
In a shocking case that sheds light on the flaws within the British legal system, notorious gang rapist Yaqub Ahmed has finally been deported to Somalia after a years-long battle. Ahmed's deportation was repeatedly hindered by a series of dubious human rights appeals, costing taxpayers nearly £1 ...

In a shocking case that sheds light on the flaws within the British legal system, notorious gang rapist Yaqub Ahmed has finally been deported to Somalia after a years-long battle. Ahmed's deportation was repeatedly hindered by a series of dubious human rights appeals, costing taxpayers nearly £1 million. The criminal was even given a stay in a luxurious hotel, armed guards, and a personalized therapy package upon his arrival in Somalia. This stark contrast to the lack of support provided for his victim highlights the loopholes exploited by foreign criminals.
Ahmed's case highlights the ease with which foreign criminals manipulate officials, also coming on the heels of the Supreme Court's rejection of an attempted deportation scheme. Former Home Secretary Suella Braverman labeled Ahmed's legal claims as "spurious, repetitive, and ultimately obstructive," emphasizing the urgent need for reform.
Amidst the litany of hearings and court battles, Ahmed took advantage of the legal system at the expense of taxpayers and justice. His legal aid costs alone tally up to nearly £85,000, while the chartered flight commissioned for his deportation cost around £200,000. It is unclear whether any other deportees were on board.
Ahmed's audacity extended to fabricating claims and exploiting legal loopholes. He falsely asserted that he would be at risk from ISIS if returned to Somalia and even utilized modern slavery laws, claiming he had been under the control of a UK drugs gang. These false claims were supported by a senior BBC editor, whose objectivity and testimony were heavily criticized by judges.
The extent of Ahmed's deception was revealed after court orders restricted reporting on his case. These orders, granting him anonymity for over three months after his deportation, were viewed as extremely concerning by media watchdogs. Victim rights advocates argue that Ahmed's human rights should not take precedence over those of his victim and others like her.
This case exposes the challenges faced by the Home Office in returning foreign criminals to their countries of origin, occasionally requiring support packages to secure court agreement for deportation. With approximately 14,700 foreign criminals deported between January 2019 and March 2023, there is an urgent need to address the flaws in the system. High-profile cases like Ahmed's highlight the pressing necessity for comprehensive legal reform to ensure justice is served and victims are not further victimized by lengthy and costly appeals.